ย 

Family Ties: Cousins King George V And Tsar Nicholas II On Noble Blood

Portrait of Czar Nicholas II

In the early 1900โ€™s, England was ruled by King George V and Russia ruled by Tsar Nicholas II, Georgeโ€™s cousin. The two cousins were extremely close, calling each other โ€œGeorgieโ€ and โ€œNickyโ€ in their letters, and in fact they looked so similar, โ€œthe same blue eyes, same beard...when they were at events together...relatives would come up from behind with the wrong name,โ€ author Dana Schwartz tells us. โ€œThey were cousins who looked more like twins.โ€ But when a peasant revolt was brutally put down in 1905, public sentiment turned against the tsar, and the Russian people started to rise up against the royal family. The tsar abdicated his throne, but it wasnโ€™t enough for the Bolshevik extremists who had overthrown him; they wanted blood. The murders of the tsar and his entire family have inspired movies, TV series, and books, mainly about one daughter, Anastasia, who was rumored to have escaped the Bolsheviks. โ€œBut if you look to history, there was another...alternate reality in which the Romanov family was saved at the 11th hour. For a brief moment in time, it seemed that their savior would be King George V.โ€ On this episode of Noble Blood, Dana examines the relationship between the two cousins, the two countries, and the political machinations that led to the bloody end of the tsar.ย 

After the peasant massacre by the Imperial Guards, the tsar was given the nickname โ€œNicholas the Bloody,โ€ and things only got worse from there. His wife, Alexandra of Hesse, was a German princess, and the outbreak of World War I led to even greater dislike of the royal family: โ€œAccording to the people in Russia, Alexandra was almost certainly a German spy, and that's to say nothing of the way she cavorted about with the dubious character Rasputin,โ€ Dana relates, โ€œthe two of them lovers, no doubt, or probably manipulating the tsar to their nefarious, German-loving ways.โ€ Anti-German sentiment ran so high, in fact, that over in England, King George V was compelled to change his family name from โ€œSaxe-Coburg and Gothaโ€ to the more British-sounding โ€œWindsor.โ€ย 

Finally, after years of unrest, revolution broke out in Russia in 1917, and the tsar was forced to abdicate his throne and go into hiding with his family, in the custody of the provisional government. โ€œThe imperial family presented a massive problem for the provisional government,โ€ Dana says; they didnโ€™t want them in the country where they could inspire loyalty, but the Bolshevik extremists wanted the tsar imprisoned and tried. โ€œIt was about this time when the provisional government's foreign minister, a man named Pavel Milyukov, approached the British ambassador and requested that the imperial family might be allowed to come to England.โ€ But that request presented its own problems. Firstly, the British public were mainly on the side of the revolutionaries, instead of the aristocrats: โ€œNews of the Russian's tsar being overthrown was met in England with cheers, with celebrations in the street for the common people who rose up to take down an autocrat,โ€ Dana says. โ€œHosting the tsar and his wife would be nothing short of a PR nightmare.โ€ And while the king was worried for his cousin and friend, he also had to be cautious. โ€œRevolutions can be like dominoes, and threats to one monarchy are threats to all monarchies. His own crown began feeling a little loose.โ€ย 

But the British didnโ€™t want to turn down the request outright, either, since Russia was still an important ally. โ€œThey would need to stay in Russia's good graces for trade and for continued support in World War I,โ€ Dana points out, โ€œbut there was no way around the fact that bringing โ€˜Bloody Nicholasโ€™ and his German empress to England would look bad...Regardless of what the political situation actually was, the truth is it would look like a move of family loyalty, and not diplomacy.โ€ Plus, Britain was a constitutional monarchy, where โ€œa king's power is at the mercy of the people. Nicholas II was radioactive, and George needed to protect himself. He wasn't 'Georgie.' He was King George V. He put England - and himself - first.โ€

Antique photograph: Czar Nicholas II and Family

Although it seems like King George turned his back on his family when they needed him most, the truth is it might not have made any difference even if he had ordered the entire household brought to England at once and installed in Buckingham Palace. โ€œBy the time it became clear that the tsar and his family were in danger, it was probably already too late.โ€ And no one could have predicted the gruesome way the royals would be murdered, in a dank basement in Ekaterinburg, their last sights the barrels of Russian rifles, the screams of their children echoing in their ears.ย 

Listen to find out how the Romanov family met its end, the hard decisions King George V had to make, and the true villain of the story, in this episode of Noble Blood.ย 

If you want to be sure you're listening to the podcasts everyone else is checking out, iHeartRadio has you covered. Every Monday, iHeartRadio releases a chart showing the most popular podcasts of the week. Stay up to date on what's trending by checking out the chart here. There's even a chart just for radio podcasts here, featuring all your favorite iHeartRadio personalities like Bobby Bones, Elvis Duran, Steve Harvey and dozens of others.

Photos: Getty Images


Sponsored Content

Sponsored Content

ย